Movie Review: Smurfs: The Lost Village 8-23-17
Before
Disney and Pixar became equal, Sony Pictures Animation and The Kerner
Entertainment Company made two disposable live-action Smurfs movies.
However, these Smurfs looked too real and kind of ugly.
They
also made drastic changes to the human antagonist Gargamel: Instead of
wanting to kill the Smurfs so he can turn them into gold, Gargamel wants
to capture the Smurfs so he can harness their energy to rule the world.
The
Smurfs (2011) and The Smurfs 2 (2013) were basically a mess. When I
heard there was going to be another Smurfs film, I thought it would be
live-action like the previous installments. However, when I saw a
trailer for this movie about a year ago, I decided to give this film a
watch. Unfortunately, I was unable to see it in theaters for personal
reasons.
Since
most of Sony Pictures Animation's films like Open Season, Cloudy With a
Chance of Meatballs, and Hotel Transylvania have rather
cartoony-looking character designs, it would only make sense to have an
all-CGI Smurfs movie. Unfortunately, the film became Sony Pictures
Animation's first box-office failure. But is this film worth watching?
Let's find out.
Directed by animation legend Kelly Asbury, Smurfs: The Lost Village tells
the story of Smurfette (Demi Lovato), the only female Smurf, trying to
find out her purpose in Smurf Village. After finding a mysterious map,
she embarks on an adventure with Clumsy (Jack McBrayer), Hefty (Joe
Manganiello), and Brainy (Danny Pudi) to go through the Forbidden Forest
to find a secret village. However, they have to find the village before
Gargamel (Rainn Wilson) gets there first.
Now,
what do I think of the movie? Well, it's no 'Horton Hears a Who' or
'Peanuts Movie', but Smurfs: The Lost Village stays quite true to its
original source material. I actually liked this film better than Trolls!
It seems Sony learned their lesson after two stale live-action Smurfs
stuffed with Hollywood production values, product placement, and actors
who needed to be recast. Instead of looking creepy, these Smurfs look
cute and truer to Peyo's original designs.
The animation of the non-Smurf characters is excellent, too. Gargamel and Azrael look much like their Peyo counterparts.
There
are also several new unique creatures and characters, such as
fire-breathing dragonflies, a ladybug who's companions with Brainy,
glow-in-the-dark bunnies, and Monty, a bird who's acquainted with
Gargomel. There is also a village of Smurfs who are all female, which is a unique twist.
Aside
from the gorgeous animation, the story also stays true to Peyo's
creations. I bet that cartoon legends William Hannah and Joseph Barbara
(who created their own incarnations of The Smurfs in the 1980s) would be
smiling from heaven.
With all this said, Smurfs: The Lost Village does have its flaws. One flaw Rachel pointed out is that the male Smurfs (Smurf Village) and the female Smurfs (Smurfy Grove) have very different hobbies. The new female Smurfs also have mild girl stereotypes, though not as offensive as a Loud House episode.
With all this said, Smurfs: The Lost Village does have its flaws. One flaw Rachel pointed out is that the male Smurfs (Smurf Village) and the female Smurfs (Smurfy Grove) have very different hobbies. The new female Smurfs also have mild girl stereotypes, though not as offensive as a Loud House episode.
In
conclusion, while not as good as Captain Underpants or Cars 3, Smurfs:
The Lost Village is a film that deserves a little more recognition.
Rating: 3 stars out of 5.
No comments:
Post a Comment